Table of Contents | Search Technical Documentation | References
Suppose
common population linking is used to align the digitally based assessment (DBA) scores from future reporting samples to the existing trend scale used in reporting the paper-based assessment (PBA) results (referred to as trend PBA). In NAEP, two randomly equivalent samples from the same population, one administered with DBA, while the other one with PBA (referred to as bridge PBA), are used in estimating the common population linking function. An approach is described below for estimating error variance of the group statistics for the DBA assessments. The statistic of interest,
, can be a mean, a percentage, an achievement-level percentage, etc.
Procedures for estimating error variance for DBA group scale score statistics, when comparing groups between DBA and trend PBA—External Linking
Suppose that the common population linking functions are estimated using two randomly equivalent samples—the DBA sample and the bridge PBA sample, and then applied to link the results of a third independent DBA sample to the existing trend scale in reporting the trend PBA results. This is referred to as external linking.
Suppose the DBA results are linked to the trend scale in reporting PBA via external linking. When comparing the DBA result,
, to the trend PBA result,
, where PBA and DBA are two independent samples, the error variance of
is
(1)
is estimated as
, (2)
where
and
are the
sampling and measurement variances for
.
is estimated as
, (3)
where
and
are the
sampling and measurement variances for
. The term
is the linking error variance associated with the uncertainty in estimating the common population linking function. When external linking is used,
is estimated using a quadratic function which describes the relationship between the linking variance and
. Specifically, the quadratic function for any subgroup has the following general form:
, (4)
where
,
, and
are coefficients estimated through a Monte Carlo based method. See
Mazzeo, Donoghue, Liu, and Xu (2018) for more discussion of the method of calculating the linking variance for external linking.
The approach described here is used in estimating the error variance of the statistics from Mathematics and Reading DBA at grades 4 and 8, when comparing the group scale score statistics from the DBA in 2017 and future years to those from PBA in 2015 and earlier years. Tables that provide the quadratic function coefficients for means and percentages, standard deviations, and achievement-level percentages can be accessed via links in the table below.
The linking error component derived from external linking does not apply when
.
set of
plausible values (PVs), calculate
, where
.
is estimated as
, (5)
is the sampling variance, considering the uncertainty due to sampling in deriving the linking functions as well as in the estimation of the group statistics;
is the measurement variance, considering the uncertainty due to latency in deriving the linking functions as well as in estimation of the group statistics.
using the combined PBA/DBA sample, for a subscale
s.
, a total of 62 pairs of transformation coefficients
are used. These transformation coefficients are derived from linking the DBA mean and standard deviation to the PBA mean and standard deviation for each replicate
i. Also, the first set of PVs of the combined sample
are used. Here,
is the DBA PVs, and
is the bridge PBA PVs.
, do the following:
to transform
, in the following way:
. (6)
with the bridge PBA-part of the PVs,
to get the combined PV:
.
based on
and
where
denote the
replicate weight for the combined sample.
is then calculated as
(7)
.
, 100 pairs of one set of PBA PVs and one set of DBA PVs are randomly chosen. This leads to a total of 100 pairs of transformation coefficients, which are grouped into 5 replications with 20 pairs of coefficients within each replication:
.
replication,

, combine them with the bridge PBA PVs as
is a random permutation of the 20 sets of bridge PBA PVs,
which is used in deriving the transformation coefficients
.
using the
replication of coefficients is calculated as
(8)
is calculated based on
, weighted by the student sampling weight. And
.
is then calculated as:
where
.
.
set of PVs on composite scale where
is the first set of composite scale PVs for bridge PBA.
on composite scale,
is then calculated as
(9)
is calculated based on
and
.
.
set of PVs within replication
on composite scale; where
is the
set of composite scale PV for bridge PBA within replication
.
is calculated as
(10)
is calculated based on
, weighted by the student sampling weight, and
.1) estimating error variance for the combined PBA/DBA sample group scale scores statistics themselves within 2018; or2) comparing the group scale score statistics from the combined PBA/DBA sample in 2018 to those from trend PBA in 2014 and earlier years.
, to the one estimated from trend PBA in previous years,
, where the trend PBA sample and the combined sample are independent, the error variance of
is
. (11)
is estimated as
, (12)
and
are the sampling and measurement variances for
.| Year | Subject area |
|---|---|
| 2019 | Mathematics |
| Reading | |
| Science | |
| 2018 | Civics |
| Geography | |
| U.S. history | |
| 2017 | Mathematics |
| Reading | |
| SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017, 2018, and 2019 Assessments. | |